Clik here to view.
In data we trust
When we screen data, we match data patterns we know to be non-matches. If they occur frequently enough, we can choose to ignore that pattern going forward. In general, there are two generic types of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Assuming a wee bit of risk…
In the previous post, we laid out how firms use repeated patterns in their data and/or patterns in the matched watchlist listing to ignore matches. The upside of those strategies is that the risk, if...
View ArticleClik here to view.
What’s the frequency, Kenneth?
In a recent post, I suggested that workflow design be dictated, to some extent, by volumes. If you have lots of states or work folders that are lightly used, you might be better off with rethinking how...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Matching Multiple Factors
If your main focus is screening business transactions, you can skip to the next blog item you wanted to read – nothing to see here for you. On the other hand, if you screen static data, like customer...
View ArticleClik here to view.
OFAC’s got some ‘splaining to do…
From OFAC's FAQ on how to determine if you have a match against the SDN list, we have: Step 3. How much of the SDN’s name is matching against the name of your account holder? Is just one of two or...
View Article